Food as Medicine: How Plant-Based Nutrition Helps Prevent and Manage Disease

Introduction

There is a growing interest in how nutrition can improve health in the U.S., especially when it comes to using diet as an extra tool to support medical treatment. In this article, we will look at how plant-based eating can play a role in tackling major health challenges like heart disease and cancer. We’ll also touch on autoimmune conditions, which may not always be fatal but can affect quality of life and shorten lifespan.

We will explore what the research says about how plant-based diets might help prevent disease, support recovery, and promote long-term health. Just as important, we will look at clinical evidence to see whether these diets really make a difference in prevention and treatment.

​The potential benefits are clear when you compare plant-based diets with the typical Western diet, often high in refined carbs, sugar, and unhealthy fats but lacking in fiber, vitamins, and essential nutrients. Understanding these benefits is the first step in breaking through cultural habits that keep us tied to less healthy eating patterns. Still, not all plant-based diets are the same, so choosing and implementing them wisely is key to getting results.

Adequate Plant-Based Diet for Adult Health

Not all plant-based diets are created equal. Simply cutting out animal products doesn’t automatically make a diet healthy. A well-balanced, health-supporting plant-based diet focuses on whole, minimally processed foods from a variety of groups to ensure adults get the essential macronutrients and micronutrients needed for optimal physical and mental function.
Core components include:

• Vegetables – leafy greens, cruciferous veggies, and colorful varieties
• Legumes – lentils, beans, peas, chickpeas, soy
• Whole grains – oats, brown rice, quinoa, whole wheat
• Nuts and seeds – almonds, walnuts, chia, flax, hemp
• Fruits – berries, citrus, apples, and more
• Plant-based oils – extra-virgin olive oil, flaxseed oil
• Calcium-rich foods – fortified plant milks, tofu, leafy greens

​To be effective, these diets should align with U.S. dietary guidelines. Special attention is needed for nutrients that are sometimes harder to get from plants, such as protein, iodine, zinc, calcium, non-heme iron, omega-3 fatty acids, and vitamins D and B12. Supplements can help fill these gaps when necessary.

A practical example of a healthy plant-based eating pattern might include:

• 5 or more servings of vegetables and fruits per day
• 2 to 4 servings of whole grains daily
• 2 to 3 servings of legumes daily
• Plus, nuts or seeds, fortified plant milk, and a source of omega-3s (like flax or algae)
• With Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D supplements
• While limiting refined and ultra-processed foods

By contrast, a poor-quality plant-based diet is heavy on ultra-processed snacks or meat substitutes (like chips, vegan bacon, or sugary cereals), refined grains, and sweetened drinks. Diets that lack variety—relying mostly on pasta and fruit, for example—or that miss key nutrients like B12, omega-3s, or calcium are also inadequate and not health-promoting.
With a sound understanding of what makes plant-based nutrition truly supportive, we can now look at its role in managing cardiovascular disease, cancer, and autoimmune conditions. The evidence so far is promising, but it points to meaningful benefits rather than outright cures.

Cardiovascular Diseases and Plant-Based Nutrition

Plant-based diets support cardiovascular health through several key pathways. Most importantly, they improve major risk markers for cardiovascular disease (CVD), including:

• Better metabolic control – High fiber and plant sterols help regulate blood sugar, improve insulin sensitivity, and lower both blood pressure and body mass index (1-4).
• Improved cholesterol profile – Vegan and vegetarian diets, naturally low in saturated fat and cholesterol, reduce LDL-C, total cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B, thereby lowering atherosclerosis risk (1,2,4-7).
• Reduced inflammation – These diets are linked with lower levels of inflammatory markers such as CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α, suggesting a direct benefit on vascular inflammation (8).

​The anti-inflammatory effects may partly come from removing certain animal-derived compounds:

• Heme iron (abundant in red meat) can catalyze the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which drive inflammation (9).
• Phosphatidylcholine (lecithin) and betaine, found in animal products, are metabolized by gut microbes into trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), a compound strongly linked to vascular inflammation (10).

Beyond mechanisms, clinical evidence supports the real-world benefits of plant-based nutrition. Observational and interventional studies consistently show reduced incidence and mortality from CVD among those adhering to healthy plant-based diets. For example:

• Quek et al. (11) performed a meta-analysis using plant-based dietary index (PDI) scores to distinguish healthy (hPDI) from unhealthy (uPDI) diets. They found that higher adherence to plant-based eating was significantly associated with lower CVD risk and mortality, as measured by hazard ratios.
• Gan et al. (5) also applied the PDI framework and found that the strongest adherence to healthy plant-based diets correlated with lower risks of both CVD and coronary heart disease (CHD), though not with stroke.

Taken together, the evidence suggests that plant-based nutrition offers meaningful protection for cardiovascular health—not just through theory, but also through measurable outcomes in clinical studies.
 
CDC Dietary Recommendations for Heart Disease Prevention and Management

​The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not provide strict treatment meal plans but does offer evidence-based guidance aimed at lowering cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. These recommendations highlight eating patterns that have consistently been shown to improve heart health.

The CDC emphasizes three main points:

1. Eat a Variety of Nutrient-Dense Foods
   • Vegetables (especially leafy greens, cruciferous, and colorful varieties)
   • Fruits (whole fruits rather than juice)
   • Whole grains (brown rice, oats, quinoa, whole wheat)
   • Legumes (beans, lentils, peas)
   • Nuts and seeds (unsalted, raw, or dry roasted)
   • Lean protein (such as fish, skinless poultry, or plant-based proteins like tofu and tempeh)
2. Limit Foods That Increase CVD Risk
   • Saturated fat (from red meat, butter, cheese, and other full-fat dairy)
   • Trans fats (from partially hydrogenated oils — should be avoided entirely)
   • Sodium (keep under 2,300 mg per day; even lower if hypertensive)
   • Added sugars (limit to less than 10% of daily calories, ideally less)
   • Ultra-processed foods (packaged snacks, sugary drinks, processed meats)
3. Follow Proven Dietary Patterns
   • DASH Diet (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension): Rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, with reduced sodium and saturated fat.
   • Mediterranean Diet: Emphasizes olive oil, vegetables, legumes, fish, and nuts.
   • Vegetarian or Plant-Based Diets: When well-planned, these are linked to lower LDL cholesterol, blood pressure, and body mass index (BMI).

Web resources  provided by the CDC include the following:

• Preventing Heart Disease
• Healthy Eating Tips
• Healthy Eating Communications Kit

The American Heart Society and the Mayo Clinic also offer specific dietary guidance:

• The American Heart Association Diet and Lifestyle Recommendations

• Heart-healthy diet: 8 steps to prevent heart disease

Cancer and Plant-Based Nutrition

Cancer Liability in Meat Products

​The National Cancer Institute warns that meat cooked at high temperatures contains carcinogens—a caution that alone should encourage the public to limit or avoid meat, since most meat is typically cooked before consumption. Replacing cooked meat with plant-based alternatives can only benefit health.
The key carcinogens in cooked meat are heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs):

• HCAs form when amino acids, sugars, creatine, and creatinine react at high temperatures (200–300°C).
• PAHs arise when fats drip onto hot surfaces or open flames, producing smoke that coats the meat or is inhaled nearby (12-14).

​Both HCAs and PAHs are mutagenic. They require activation by liver enzymes and form DNA adducts—a critical step toward chemical carcinogenesis (15-16).
Even uncooked meat carries cancer risks due to heme iron, the iron-containing complex found abundantly in hemoglobin and myoglobin. Heme iron is highly bioavailable and chemically reactive, participating in redox reactions that promote lipid peroxidation and potentially carcinogenic compounds. Key pathways include:

• Lipid oxidation: Heme iron reacts with hydrogen peroxide and lipid hydroperoxides to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), triggering peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids and producing cytotoxic aldehydes such as malondialdehyde (MDA) and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), which can form DNA adducts (17-19).
• Endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds (NOCs): Heme iron catalyzes nitrosation reactions between dietary nitrites/nitrates and amines or amides, producing nitrosamines and nitrosamides, potent DNA-alkylating agents (20-21). These compounds can form covalent DNA adducts, causing miscoding, strand breaks, and genomic instability—a hallmark of cancer initiation (22).

DNA adduct formation is a crucial early step in carcinogenesis. If adducts escape repair, permanent mutations can accumulate in oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes such as KRAS or TP53, promoting tumor development, especially in the colorectal epithelium (23-25).
Heme iron thus has a dual role: it provides nutritional value but also promotes oxidative stress and DNA-reactive compounds, explaining why high red and processed meat consumption is linked to cancer.

Potential Cancer Liability in Dairy Products

Milk and dairy products contain significant amounts of growth factors and sex hormones, which has raised concern among medical researchers because of their potential cancer-promoting effects (26-28).
IGF‑1

• Significant levels: Cow’s milk naturally contains IGF‑1 (insulin-like growth factor 1), typically around 4 ± 1 ng/mL in non-colostrum milk, with potentially higher levels when cows are treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST/rBGH). Bovine IGF‑1 is identical to human IGF‑1, resists pasteurization, and can remain intact in processed milk. Observational and intervention studies show that each 200 g/day increase in milk intake is associated with about a 10 µg/L rise in circulating IGF‑1 in adults, while cheese and yogurt show no such correlation.
• Potential risk: Elevated systemic IGF‑1 levels have been linked epidemiologically to higher risks of multiple cancers, including prostate (29-30), breast (28), endometrial (31), and colorectal cancer (32). A systematic review of 173 studies concluded that milk intake modestly increases circulating IGF‑1, and higher IGF‑1 levels correlate with elevated prostate cancer risk (33).

Estrone, estradiol, and progesterone

• Significant levels :Milk also contains measurable amounts of these steroid hormones, as most dairy cows used in production are pregnant. They are lipophilic hormones and remain in the fat fraction, so whole milk has higher concentrations than skimmed varieties.
• Potential risk :Steroid sex hormones in milk could theoretically stimulate the growth of hormone-dependent cancer cells. Experimental studies have shown that milk extracts can enhance the growth of prostate cancer cells in culture (34). Additionally, serum and urine levels of estrogen and progesterone derivatives rise significantly after consuming three to four cups of milk (35). Epidemiological data also link milk, dairy products, and dietary fats to breast (36-37, 28), endometrial (  31, 39), and prostate cancers (38, 29, 30).
• Controversy: Despite these associations, direct proof that steroid hormones in milk cause cancer is lacking. Experts remain divided: some argue that hormone levels in milk are minimal compared with endogenous production, so moderate consumption is unlikely to matter (40). Others consider the data still too conflicting to justify warnings (41-42).

Currently, neither the National Cancer Institute (NCI) nor the American Cancer Society (ACS) has issued formal advisories linking milk consumption to cancer. Other major organizations, including the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR), Cancer Research UK, the British Dietetic Association, Cancer Council Australia, and the World Cancer Research Fund, share this position.

Protective Effects of Plant-Based Diets Pre- and Post-Cancer Diagnosis

Understanding the potential risks of meat and dairy for cancer is valuable, but it is even more important to know whether avoiding these foods and favoring vegetarian or vegan diets actually makes a difference. Evidence from observational and controlled studies suggests that it does.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies found that vegetarians and vegans enjoy lower overall cancer incidence among other health benefits (1).

Breast Cancer

• Lower mortality: For breast cancer specifically, adhering to a healthful plant-based diet (hPDI) after diagnosis was linked with reduced overall and non-breast cancer mortality, while an unhealthful plant-based diet (uPDI) increased mortality (43). In another study of 8,927 women with stage I–III breast cancer, higher consumption of vegetables—especially green leafy and cruciferous types—was associated with better survival. Notably, each two servings per week of blueberries corresponded to a 25% lower breast cancer-specific and 17% lower all-cause mortality (44).
• Lower risk: A case-control study in Connecticut found that higher intake of soluble plant fibers significantly reduced breast cancer risk in premenopausal women, particularly those with estrogen receptor-negative tumors. Postmenopausal women did not experience this protective effect (45).
• Protective effects of lignans and isoflavones: Other studies confirmed these findings (46-47) while highlighting the role of lignans—plant polyphenols with antioxidant and anti-estrogenic activity—in reducing both incidence and recurrence of breast cancer (48-51). Isoflavones from soy also show protective effects, reducing both incidence and improving survival after diagnosis (52-54).
• Endometrial cancer: The benefits of plant-based diets observed in breast cancer could also be demonstrated in endometrial cancer as well (55).

Prostate Cancer

• Improved oncologic outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple prostate cancer studies showed that patients adhering to a plant-based diet after diagnosis had improved oncologic outcomes. Patients  at-risk did not benefit as much since most studies showed lower incidence or no significant difference (56).
• Protective effects of lignans and isoflavones: As in breast cancer, the beneficial effect was traced to plant products rich in isoflavones and lignans. Randomized controlled studies showed that including soy isoflavones as part of a diet plan clearly reduced the incidence of prostate cancer (57). The finding was consistent with an earlier report describing high levels of isoflavonoids and lignans in the plasma and prostatic fluids of men originating from regions where the incidence of prostate cancer is low (58).
• Protective effects of flaxseeds & nuts: Additionally, it was demonstrated in controlled clinical studies that direct supplementation of the diet of prostate cancer patients with flaxseeds, a rich source of lignans and omega-3 fatty acids, for just 30 days could lower the proliferation rates of their tumors (59). Likewise, high consumption of nuts after diagnosis was associated with reduced overall mortality by as much as 34%, although no effect on incidence could be detected (60).

Gastric cancer

• Lower risk: A systemic review and meta-analysis found that patients adhering to “Prudent/Healthy” diets consisting of mostly fruits and vegetables with extra portion of fish, poultry and potatoes, had a two-fold less gastric cancer risk than those pursuing  “Western/unhealthy” diets, which lean heavily towards starchy foods, meat and fats (61).

Colorectal Cancer (CRC)

• Lower risk: Evidence for colorectal cancer is extensive. Healthy dietary patterns featuring whole grains, nuts, vegetables, legumes, fruits, seafood, and even dairy are consistently associated with lower CRC risk, while diets high in red and processed meat, refined grains, sugary drinks, and potatoes increase risk (62-64).
• Protective effects of fiber & flavonoids: In a very large study involving 2 million participants, legume fibers and flavonoids from soy beans were singled out as principal components of diets causing a decrease in CRC risk (65). These results were consistent with earlier studies, which also emphasized the importance of fibers from whole grains (66).
• Lower mortality after diagnosis: Consumption of quality plant-based food groups  after diagnosis was also beneficial for CRC patients. Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical studies revealed a clear inverse relationship between healthy plant-based diets and all-cause mortality for CRC survivors (67-68). Plant components highlighted were fiber from cereals which were associated with both lower all-cause mortality and CRC-specific mortality whereas fiber from vegetables was only associated with lower all-cause mortality (69).
• Protective effect of nuts: Of particular interest were diets with higher consumption of nuts resulting in significantly reduced incidence of cancer recurrence and death in patients with stage III colon cancer (70).

Pancreatic Cancer

• Lower risk: It is among the deadliest forms of cancer, with one of the lowest survival rates. However, it may benefit from plant-based dietary approaches. Epidemiological studies have shown that higher consumption of fruits and vegetables is inversely associated with the risk of developing pancreatic cancer (71).
• Protective effect of fibers in wholegrains: Among various food groups, a high intake of whole grains has been specifically linked to a reduced incidence of the disease (72).
• No effect on survival after diagnosis: Despite these associations, there are currently no definitive studies or clinical trials demonstrating that plant-based diets or specific plant foods improve survival outcomes following pancreatic cancer diagnosis.

Lung Cancer

• Lower risk: Healthier, plant-forward diets—or higher intake of fruits and vegetables—are associated with a reduced risk of developing lung cancer (73)
• Improved survival: In contrast to pancreatic cancer, there is some observational evidence suggesting that, as well as improved overall survival in certain, though not all, cohorts of lung cancer patients (74).
• Effect on survival inconclusive: However, the evidence for a clear causal benefit of adopting a plant-based diet after a lung cancer diagnosis remains limited, heterogeneous, and inconclusive. To date, no large randomized controlled trials have demonstrated a definitive post-diagnosis survival advantage.

Overall, a well-planned plant-based diet—rich in vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, nuts, flaxseed, and soy—can reduce cancer risk and support survival after diagnosis. While not a cure, these diets complement conventional treatment and align with evidence-based guidance for both prevention and survivorship.

CDC versus NCI, AICR & ACS: Positions on Nutrition and Cancer
​

• CDC: The Centers for Disease Control does not issue cancer-specific dietary guidelines for patients or individuals at higher risk. Instead, it offers general healthy eating recommendations aligned with broader public health goals, such as maintaining a healthy weight. For example, its Guide for Healthy Living for cancer survivors—particularly the section titled Cancer Survivors: Eating Healthy—encourages replacing some meat-based meals with vegetarian options, selecting canned or frozen fruits and vegetables that are low in salt and sugar, and seeking guidance from nutrition professionals or care teams.
• NCI: By contrast, the National Cancer Institute offers more targeted guidance for cancer patients, focusing on nutrition before, during, and after treatment through resources like Nutrition During Cancer Treatment.
• AICR: The American Institute for Cancer Research emphasizes cancer prevention, providing advice through Using Healthy Eating to Lower Cancer Risk, as well as programs for survivors like Coping with Cancer in the Kitchen  .
• ACS: The American Cancer Society delivers cancer-specific nutrition advice in its Guideline for Diet and Physical Activity, which summarizes a longer position paper published in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

While the CDC takes a general approach, both the ACS and AICR provide more specific guidance for cancer prevention and survivorship. Interestingly, much of their advice—favoring vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, nuts, and minimizing red and processed meats—closely aligns with the principles of a well-planned plant-based diet. This overlap reinforces the potential value of plant-based nutrition as part of a cancer-prevention and survivorship strategy, supporting both overall health and evidence-based dietary recommendations.

---

 
Autoimmune Diseases and Plant-Based Nutrition

Learning how to use nutrition to modulate the immune system is still in its early stages. Researchers are only beginning to understand how diet influences the distribution and function of immune cells in the body. Examples of dietary patterns that modulate the immune system include:

• Diets rich in chitin:  Fibers like chitin—found in mushrooms, crustaceans, and even edible insects—can stimulate type 2 immunity, which is normally involved in defense against parasites and allergic responses (75).
• Fasting:  It reduces circulating monocytes—immune cells that defend against invaders but are also central to many autoimmune diseases. Not surprisingly, fasting has been shown to improve conditions such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, diabetes, and asthma (76).
• Feasting: In contrast, feasting on low-fiber, high-fat diets rapidly impairs both gut and systemic immunity, leaving the body more vulnerable to bacterial infections (77, see also our blog post A balancing act: keeping your gut healthy).
• Clinical evidence: Importantly, these effects have been documented not only in laboratory experiments but also in clinical settings (78).

Clinical Evidence for Plant-Based Diets in Autoimmune Diseases

On a practical level, the key question is whether specific dietary interventions can reduce the risk of autoimmune diseases in the general population—or alleviate symptoms in patients already affected.

• Reduced risk: A growing body of observational studies links high consumption of plant-based foods with decreased risk in conditions such as multiple sclerosis (79), hypothyroidism (80), hyperthyroidism (81), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (82-83).
• Symptomatic improvement in rheumatoid arthritis: The first real attempt to test vegan diets as a treatment came in 1991, with a randomized, single-blind trial of 53 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. After just four weeks, those on a vegan diet showed clear improvement in symptoms and biomarkers compared to controls, and many benefits lasted up to a year (84). These results were later supported by two small interventional trials (85-86) and more recently by a randomized cross-over study of 44 RA patients (87).
• Encouraging anecdotal reports in lupus nephritis: A case report of two patients with lupus nephritis found that switching to a raw, plant-based diet rich in leafy greens, cruciferous vegetables, omega-3 fatty acids, and water improved kidney function enough to avoid dialysis (88).
• Symptomatic improvement in SLE: In a cross-sectional study of 280 SLE patients, greater adherence to a Mediterranean diet—emphasizing plant-based over animal foods—was associated with reduced disease activity and cardiovascular risk (89). Another study of 420 SLE patients confirmed that eating more vegetables and fewer processed or animal-based foods correlated with less severe symptoms (90).
• Disease remission in SLE & Sjögren’s syndrome : Most recently, a case series of three patients with both SLE and Sjögren’s syndrome reported dramatic symptom improvements within just four weeks on a nutrient-rich, plant-based protocol (91).

​As promising as these reports are, they remain small in scale. Larger randomized controlled trials are still needed before plant-based nutrition can be established as a standard of care in autoimmune disease management. For now, adoption remains largely at the discretion of doctors and patients.

CDC vs. ACLM, ACR, and Harvard Positions
​

• CDC: It does not issue disease-specific diet guidelines for autoimmune conditions. Unlike its clearer recommendations for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or obesity prevention, the CDC offers only general advice: eat a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains; choose lean proteins; and limit sodium, added sugars, saturated fats, and processed foods. These recommendations aim to reduce systemic inflammation, maintain a healthy weight, and support overall immune health. For conditions like lupus or RA, the CDC emphasizes calcium and vitamin D intake to counteract bone loss from corticosteroid treatment. It also lists autoimmune conditions under “chronic illnesses that weaken the immune system” in its guidance on safer food choices—even though in reality the immune system in these diseases is hyperactive against self-antigens, and often suppressed with immunosuppressive therapies.
• The American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM) highlights plant-based nutrition in its guidance on Treatment and Prevention of Autoimmune Disease.
• The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends the Mediterranean diet, with specific supplements & vitamins when necessary, for patients with rheumatic illnesses.
• The Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Harvard Health Publishing offer extensive resources on anti-inflammatory eating, including Foods That Fight Inflammation, Diet Review: Anti-Inflammatory Diet, and a Quick-Start Guide to an Anti-Inflammation Diet.

​Together, these organizations acknowledge what the research suggests: plant-forward diets can help reduce inflammation and improve quality of life in autoimmune patients, even if formal national guidelines lag behind the science.

---

References

1. Dinu, M., Abbate, R., Gensini, G. F., Casini, A., & Sofi, F. Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit. Rev. in Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 3640–3649. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1138447
2. Landry, M.J., Ward, C.P., Cunanan, K.M., et al. Cardiometabolic Effects of Omnivorous vs Vegan Diets in Identical Twins: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open. 2023, 6, e2344457. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44457
3. Koutentakis, M.; Surma, S.; Rogula, S.; Filipiak, K.J.; Gąsecka, A. The Effect of a Vegan Diet on the Cardiovascular System. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10, 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10030094
4. Wang, T., Kroeger, C. M., Cassidy, S., Mitra, S., Ribeiro, R.V., Jose, S., Masedunskas, A., Senior, A.M., Fontana, L. Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and Cardiometabolic Risk in People With or at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open. 2023, 6, e2325658. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25658
5. Gan, Z.H.; Cheong, H.C.; Tu, Y.-K.; Kuo, P.-H. Association between Plant-Based Dietary Patterns and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Nutrients. 2021, 13, 3952. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113952
6. Rees K, Al-Khudairy L, Takeda A, Stranges S. Vegan dietary pattern for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD013501. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013501.pub2.
7. Koch, C.A., Kjeldsen, E.W., Frikke-Schmidt, R. Vegetarian or vegan diets and blood lipids: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur. Heart J. 2023, 44, 2609-2622. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad211
8. Menzel, J., Jabakhanji, A., Biemann, R., Mai, K., Abraham., K. & Weikert, C.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations of vegan and vegetarian diets with inflammatory biomarkers. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21736. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78426-8
9. Fang, X., An, P., Wang, H., Wang, X., Shen, X., Li, X., Min, J., Liu, S., Wang, F. Dietary intake of heme iron and risk of cardiovascular disease: A dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015, 25, 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2014.09.002.
10. Wang, Z., Klipfell, E., Bennett, B. et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011, 472, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09922
11. Quek J. , Lim G. , Lim W. H., et al. The Association of Plant-Based Diet With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Prospect Cohort Studies. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 756810. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.756810
12. Thiebaud, H.P., Knize, M.G., Kuzmicki, P.A., Hsieh, D.P. & Felton, J.S. Airborne mutagens produced by frying beef, pork and a soy-based food. Food Chem. Tox. 1995, 33, 821-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-6915(95)00057-9
13. Cross, A.J. & Sinha, R. Meat-related mutagens/carcinogens in the etiology of colorectal cancer. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2004, 44, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.20030
14. Jägerstad, M. & Skog, K. Genotoxicity of heat-processed foods. Mutat. Res. 2005, 574, 156–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.030
15. Turesky RJ. Mechanistic Evidence for Red Meat and Processed Meat Intake and Cancer Risk: A Follow-up on the International Agency for Research on Cancer Evaluation of 2015. Chimia (Aarau). 2018, 72, 718-724. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2018.718.
16. Poirier, M.C. Linking DNA adduct formation and human cancer risk in chemical carcinogenesis. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2016, 57, 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22030
17. Sesink, A. L. A., Termont, D. S., Kleibeuker, J. H., & Van der Meer, R. Red meat and colon cancer: the cytotoxic and hyperproliferative effects of dietary heme. Cancer Res. 1999,  59, 5704–5709.
18. Bastide, N. M., Pierre, F. H. F., & Corpet, D. E. Heme iron from meat and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and a review of the mechanisms involved. Cancer Prev. Res. 2011, 4, 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0113
19. Marnett, L. J. Lipid peroxidation–DNA damage by malondialdehyde. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 1999, 424, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(99)00010-X
20. Jakszyn, P., & González, C. A. Nitrosamine and related food intake and gastric and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review of epidemiologic evidence. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 4296–4303. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i27.4296
21. Kuhnle, G. G. C., Bingham, S. A. Dietary meat, endogenous nitrosation and colorectal cancer. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2007, 35, 1355–1357. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0351355
22. Shuker, D. E. G., & Margison, G. P. Nitrosated glycine derivatives as a potential source of O6-methylguanine in DNA. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 366–369.
23. Sugimura, T. Nutrition and dietary carcinogens. Carcinogenesis. 2000, 21, 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/21.3.387
24. Pierre, F., Tache, S., & Corpet, D. E. Meat and cancer: haemoglobin and hemin in a low-calcium diet promote colorectal carcinogenesis at the aberrant crypt stage in rats. Carcinogenesis. 2003, 24, 1683–1690. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgg130
25. Constante, M., Fragoso, G., Calvé, A., Samba-Mondonga, M., Santos, M.M. Dietary heme induces gut dysbiosis, aggravates colitis, and potentiates the development of adenomas in mice. Front. microbiol. 2017, 8,1809. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01809
26. Malekinejad, H. & Rezabakhsh A. Hormones in Dairy Foods and Their Impact on Public Health - A Narrative Review Article. Iran J. Public Health. 2015, 44, 742-58. PMID: 26258087; PMCID: PMC4524299.
27. Romo Ventura, E., Konigorski, S., Rohrmann, S., Schneider, H., Stalla, G.K., Pischon, T., Linseisen, J., Nimptsch, K. Association of dietary intake of milk and dairy products with blood concentrations of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in Bavarian adults. Eur J Nutr. 2020, 59,1413-1420. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-019-01994-7
28. Melnik, B.C., John, S.M., Carrera-Bastos, P. et al. The Role of Cow’s Milk Consumption in Breast Cancer Initiation and Progression. Curr Nutr. Rep. 2023, 12, 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-023-00457-0
29. Rowlands, M.-A., Gunnell, D., Harris, R., Vatten, L.J., Holly, J.M.P. and Martin, R.M. Circulating insulin-like growth factor peptides and prostate cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer. 2009, 124, 2416-2429. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24202
30. Aune, D.,  Navarro Rosenblatt, D.A., Chan, S.S.M., et al. Dairy products, calcium, and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 101, 87-117. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.067157
31. Ganmaa, D., Cui, X., Feskanich, D., Hankinson, S.E. and Willett, W.C. (2012), Milk, dairy intake and risk of endometrial cancer: A 26-year follow-up. Int. J. Cancer. 2012, 130, 2664-2671. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.26265
32. Schwingshackl, L., Schwedhelm, C., Hoffmann, G., Knüppel, S., Laure Preterre, A., Iqbal, K., Bechthold, A., De Henauw, S., Michels, N., Devleesschauwer, B., Boeing, H. and Schlesinger, S. Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2018, 142, 1748-1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31198
33. Harrison, S., Lennon, R., Holly, J. et al. Does milk intake promote prostate cancer initiation or progression via effects on insulin-like growth factors (IGFs)? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2017, 28, 497–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0883-1
34. Tate, P. L., Bibb, R., & Larcom, L. L. (2011). Milk Stimulates Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells in Culture. Nutr. Cancer. 63, 1361–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2011.609306
35. Maruyama, K., Oshima, T. and Ohyama, K. Exposure to exogenous estrogen through intake of commercial milk produced from pregnant cows. Pediatr. Int. 2010, 52, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200X.2009.02890.x
36. Fraser,G.E., Jaceldo-Siegl, K., Orlich, M., Mashchak, A., Sirirat, R. & Knutsen, S. Dairy, soy, and risk of breast cancer: those confounded milks, Int. J. Epidemiol. 2020, 49, 1526–1537. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa007
37. Brennan, S. F., Woodside, J. V., Lunny, P. M., Cardwell, C. R., & Cantwell, M. M. (2017). Dietary fat and breast cancer mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.724481
38. Qin, L.Q., Xu, J.Y., Wang, P.Y. and Tong, J. Milk consumption is a risk factor for prostate cancer in Western countries: evidence from cohort studies. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007. 16, 467-476.
39. Si, C-J., Shu, L., Zheng, P-F., Zhang, X-Y., Yu, X-L., Gao, W., Zhang, L. Dietary patterns and endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2017.  26, 336-345. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000266
40. Macrina,A.L., Ott, T.L, Roberts, R.F.,  Kensinger, R.S. Estrone and Estrone Sulfate Concentrations in Milk and Milk Fractions. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2012, 112,1088-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.02.005.
41. Ganmaa, D. & Sato, A. The possible role of female sex hormones in milk from pregnant cows in the development of breast, ovarian and corpus uteri cancers. Med. Hypotheses. 2005, 65, 1028-1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2005.06.026.
42. Chagas, C.E., Rogero, M.M., Martini, L.A. Evaluating the links between intake of milk/dairy products and cancer, Nutr. Rev. 2012, 70, 294–300, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00464.x
43. Anyene, I. C., Ergas, I. J., Kwan, M. L., Roh, J. M., Ambrosone, C. B., Kushi, L. H., & Cespedes Feliciano, E. M. (). Plant-Based Dietary Patterns and Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival in the Pathways Study. Nutrients. 2021, 13, 3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103374
44. Farvid, M.S., Holmes, M.D., Chen, W.Y., Rosner, B.A., Tamimi, R.M.,  Willett, W.C., Eliassen, A.H. Postdiagnostic Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Breast Cancer Survival: Prospective Analyses in the Nurses' Health Studies. Cancer Res.  2020, 80,  5134–5143. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3515
45. Li, Q., Holford, T.R., Zhang, Y. et al. Dietary fiber intake and risk of breast cancer by menopausal and estrogen receptor status. Eur. J. Nutr. 2013, 52, 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-012-0305-9
46. Aune, D. , Chan, D.S.M., Greenwood, D.C. , Vieira, A.R., Navarro Rosenblatt, D.A., Vieira, R.,  Norat, T. Dietary fiber and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann. Oncol. 2012, 23, 1394-1402. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr589.
47. Dong, J-Y, He, K., Wang, P., Qin, L-Q. Dietary fiber intake and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 94, 900-905. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.015578.
48. Buck, K., Zaineddin, A.K., Vrieling, A., Linseisen, J., Chang-Claude, J. Meta-analyses of lignans and enterolignans in relation to breast cancer risk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 141-153. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.28573.
49. Boccardo, F., Lunardi, G., Guglielmini, P., Parodi, M., Murialdo, R., Schettini, G., Rubagotti, A. Serum enterolactone levels and the risk of breast cancer in women with palpable cysts. Eur. J. Cancer. 2004, 40, 84-89. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00576-8 
50. Buck, K., Vrieling, A., Zaineddin, A.K., Becker, S., Husing, A., Kaaks, R., Linseisen, J., Flesch-Janys, D. and Chang-Claude, J.  Serum Enterolactone and Prognosis of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 3730-3738. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.34.6478
51. McCann, S.E., Thompson, L.U., Nie, J. et al. Dietary lignan intakes in relation to survival among women with breast cancer: the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) Study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010, 122, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0681-x
52. Korde, L.A., Wu, A.H., Fears, T., Nomura, A.M.Y., West, D.W., Kolonel, L.N., Pike, M.C., Hoover, R.N.,  Ziegler, R.G. Childhood Soy Intake and Breast Cancer Risk in Asian American Women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.  2009, 18, 1050-1059.  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0405
53. Kang, H-B., Zhang, Y-F., Yang, J-D. & Lu, K-L. Study on Soy Isoflavone Consumption and Risk of Breast Cancer and Survival. Asian Pacific J. Cancer Prev. 2012, 13, 995-998. http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.3.995
54. Zhang, F.F., Haslam, D.E, Terry, M.B., Knight, J.A., Andrulis, I.L., Daly, M.B., Saundra S. Buys, S.S. & John, E.M. Dietary Isoflavone Intake and All-Cause Mortality in Breast Cancer Survivors: The Breast Cancer Family Registry. Cancer. 2017, 123, 2070-2079. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30615
55. McCann, S.E., Freudenheim, J.L., Marshall, J.R. et al. Diet in the epidemiology of endometrial cancer in Western New York (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2000, 11, 965–974. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026551309873
56. Gupta, N., Patel, H.D., Taylor, J. et al. Systematic review of the impact of a plant-based diet on prostate cancer incidence and outcomes. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022, 25, 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00553-2
57. van Die, M.D., Bone, K.M., Williams, S.G. & Pirotta, M.V., Soy and soy isoflavones in prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2014, 113, E119-E130. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12435
58. Morton, M.S., Chan, P.S.F., Cheng, C., Blacklock, N., Matos-Ferreira, A., Abranches-Monteiro, L., Correia, R., Llyod, S. and Griffiths, K. Lignans and isoflavonoids in plasma and prostatic fluid in men: Samples from Portugal, Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom. Prostate. 1997, 32, 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19970701)32:2<122::AID-PROS7>3.0.CO;2-O
59. Demark-Wahnefried, W., Polascik, T.J., George, S.L., Switzer, B.R., Madden, J.F., Ruffin, M.T., Snyder, D.C., Owzar, K., Hars, V., Albala, D.M., Walther, P.J., Robertson, C.N., Moul, J.W., Dunn, B.K., Brenner, D., Minasian, L., Stella, P., Vollmer, R.T. Flaxseed Supplementation (Not Dietary Fat Restriction) Reduces Prostate Cancer Proliferation Rates in Men Presurgery. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.  2008, 17, 3577–3587. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0008
60. Wang, W., Yang, M., Kenfield, S. et al. Nut consumption and prostate cancer risk and mortality. Br. J. Cancer. 2016, 115, 371–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.181
61. Bertuccio, P., Rosato, V., Andreano, A., Ferraroni, M., Decarli, A., Edefonti, V., La Vecchia, C. Dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Oncol. 2013, 24, 1450-1458. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt108.
62. Pan, P., Yu, J., Wang, L-S. Colon Cancer: What We Eat. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2018 , 27, 243-267.
63. Schwingshackl, L., Schwedhelm, C., Hoffmann, G., Knüppel, S., Laure Preterre, A., Iqbal, K., Bechthold, A., De Henauw, S., Michels, N., Devleesschauwer, B., Boeing, H. & Schlesinger, S. Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer.  2018, 142, 1748-1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31198
64. Tabung, F.K., Brown, L.S. & Fung, T.T. Dietary Patterns and Colorectal Cancer Risk: a Review of 17 Years of Evidence (2000–2016). Curr. Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2017, 13, 440–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-017-0390-5
65. Zhu, B., Sun, Y., Qi, L. et al. Dietary legume consumption reduces risk of colorectal cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8797. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08797
66. Aune, D., Chan, D.S.M, Lau, R., Vieira, R., Greenwood, D.C., Kampman, E. et al. Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. 2011, 343 :d6617. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6617
67. Ratjen, I., Enderle, J., Burmeister, G., Koch, M., Nöthlings, U., Hampe, J. & Lieb, W. Post-diagnostic reliance on plant-compared with animal-based foods and all-cause mortality in omnivorous long-term colorectal cancer survivors. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021,114, 441-449. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab061
68. Hoang, T., Kim, H., & Kim, J. (). Dietary Intake in Association with All-Cause Mortality and Colorectal Cancer Mortality among Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies. Cancers. 2020, 12, 3391. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113391
69. Song, M,, Wu, K., Meyerhardt, J.A., et al. Fiber Intake and Survival After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 71–79. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3684
70. Fadelu, T., Zhang, S., Niedzwiecki, D. et al. Nut Consumption and Survival in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: Results From CALGB 89803 (Alliance). J. Clin. Onol. 2018, 36, 1112-1120. DOI:10.1200/JCO.2017.75.5413
71. Wu, Q-J., Wu, L., Zheng, L-Q.,  Xu, X., Ji, C. & Gong, T-T. Consumption of fruit and vegetables reduces risk of pancreatic cancer: evidence from epidemiological studies. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2016, 25, 196-205. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000171
72. Lei, Q.,  Zheng, H., Bi, J., Wang, X., Jiang, T., Gao, X., Tian, F., Xu, M., Wu, C., Zhang, L., Li & N., Li, J. Whole Grain Intake Reduces Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Medicine. 2016, 95, e2747. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002747.
73. Wei, W., Wang, S., Yuan, Z. et al. Plant-based diets and the risk of lung cancer: a large prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Nutr. 2025, 64, 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03570-0
74. Wang, Q., Cui, Q., Gao, J-P. & Zhao, Y-H. Plant-based dietary patterns and lung cancer mortality: a perspective cohort study. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 6470-6481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D3FO01803B
75. Do-Hyun Kim et al. A type 2 immune circuit in the stomach controls mammalian adaptation to dietary chitin. Science. 2023, 381,1092-1098.DOI:10.1126/science.add5649
76. Jordan, S., Tung, N., Casanova-Acebes, M., et al. Dietary Intake Regulates the Circulating Inflammatory Monocyte Pool. Cell. 2019, 178, 1102-1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.050.
77. Siracusa, F., Schaltenberg, N., Kumar, Y. et al. Short-term dietary changes can result in mucosal and systemic immune depression. Nat. Immunol. 2023, 24, 1473–1486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-023-01587-x
78. Link, V.M., Subramanian, P., Cheung, F. et al. Differential peripheral immune signatures elicited by vegan versus ketogenic diets in humans. Nat. Med. 2024, 30, 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02761-2
79. Lauer, K. The risk of multiple sclerosis in the U.S.A. in relation to sociogeographic features: A factor-analytic study. J. Clin. l Epidemiol. 1994, 47, 43 – 48. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90032-9
80. Tonstad, S., Nathan, E., Oda, K. & Fraser, G. Vegan Diets and Hypothyroidism. Nutrients. 2013, 5, 4642-4652. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5114642
81. Tonstad, S., Nathan, E., Oda, K. & Fraser, G. Prevalence of hyperthyroidism according to type of vegetarian diet. Public Health Nutr. 2015,18, 1482-1487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014002183
82. Barbhaiya, M., Tedeschi, S., Sparks, J.A., Leatherwood, C., Karlson, E.W., Willett, W.C., Lu, B. & Costenbader, K.H. Association of Dietary Quality With Risk of Incident Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the Nurses’ Health Study and Nurses’ Health Study II. Arthritis Care Res. 2021, 73, 1250-1258. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24443
83. Oh, J., Oda, K., Brash, M., et al. The association between dietary patterns and a doctor diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: the Adventist Health Study-2. Lupus. 2022, 31, 1373-1378. doi:10.1177/09612033221112522
84. Kjeldsen-Kragh, J., Borchgrevink, C.F, Laerum, E., Haugen, M., Eek, M., Førre, O., Mowinkel, P. & Hovi, K. Controlled trial of fasting and one-year vegetarian diet in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 1991, 338, 899-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)91770-U.
85. Hafström, I., Ringertz, B., Spångberg, A., von Zweigbergk, L., Brannemark, S., Nylander, I., Rönnelid, J., Laasonen, L. & Klareskog, L. A vegan diet free of gluten improves the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis: the effects on arthritis correlate with a reduction in antibodies to food antigens, Rheumatology. 2001, 40,1175-1179, https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/40.10.1175
86. McDougall, J., Bruce, B., Spiller, G., Westerdahl, J. & McDougall, M. Effects of a Very Low-Fat, Vegan Diet in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2002, 8, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1089/107555302753507195
87. Barnard, N.D., Levin, S., Crosby, L., Flores, R., Holubkov, R. & Kahleova, H. A Randomized, Crossover Trial of a Nutritional Intervention for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2022, 19, 266-275. doi:10.1177/15598276221081819
88. Goldner, B. Six Week Raw Vegan Nutrition Protocol Rapidly Reverses Lupus Nephritis: A Case Series. ijdrp. 2019,1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/ijdrp.2019v1n1a47
89. Pocovi-Gerardino, G., Correa-Rodríguez, M., Callejas-Rubio, J-L., Ríos-Fernández, R., Martín-Amada, M., Cruz-Caparros, M-G., Rueda-Medina, B., Ortego-Centeno, N. Beneficial effect of Mediterranean diet on disease activity and cardiovascular risk in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatology. 2021, 60, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa210
90. Knippenberg, A., Robinson, G.A., Wincup, C., Ciurtin, C., Jury, E.C., Kalea, A.Z. Plant-based dietary changes may improve symptoms in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2022, 31, 65-76. doi:10.1177/09612033211063795
91. Goldner, B. & Staffier, K.L. Case series: raw, whole, plant-based nutrition protocol rapidly reverses symptoms in three women with systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren’s syndrome. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1208074. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1208074